Comments on: Review of the new Breguet Military Type 20 and Civilian Type XX

By: Reg

Reg — Sun, 11 Jun 2023 14:24:05 +0000

In reply to J. Quincy Magoo. It’s basically the opposite of a review written using artificial intelligence. 100% Organic Idiot…

By: Russell Fit

Russell Fit — Sun, 11 Jun 2023 03:05:23 +0000

In reply to J. Quincy Magoo. Totally with with your sentiments. The journalistic integrity of this “review” was questionable. I had to scroll up to verify if this article had the “in collaboration with” disclaimer.

By: J. Quincy Magoo

J. Quincy Magoo — Sat, 10 Jun 2023 15:38:45 +0000

Historical excellence? Yes. Historical counterparts? Not so much! You give these editions a favorable review, but it comes across more as a sponsorship rather than an objective rendering. I’m not so sure you understand the difference. It’s more than a placement or the position of the placement of a date window. It’s also where they place the “swiss made” moniker. It’s the cutting off numerals, it’s the size of the case. A version of a previous edition perhaps, but a historical version. Eh.

By: Review of the new Breguet Military Type 20 and Civilian Type XX – Horopedia.ch

Sat, 10 Jun 2023 14:23:14 +0000

[…] post Review of the new Breguet Military Type 20 and Civilian Type XX appeared first on […]